Hello, Guest

Browse Standards

View all PreK-12 NYS Learning Standards in a dropdown list format.
  • - Drill Down
  • - Print
  • - Create PDF
  • - Send to a Friend
  • - Add to My ePortfolio
  • - Educational Resources
  • - Assessments
  • - Common Core
  • Reset Browse Standards
  • Standard Area - TECH: Learning Standards for Technology
    (see MST standards under Previous Standard Versions)
        • Introduction - MST3.G.Introduction: Integrated Geometry

          In implementing the Geometry process and content performance indicators, it is expected that students will identify and justify geometric relationships, formally and informally. For example, students will begin with a definition of a figure and from that definition, students will be expected to develop a list of conjectured properties of the figure and to justify each conjecture informally or with formal proof. Students will also be expected to list the assumptions that are needed in order to justify each conjectured property and present their findings in an organized manner.

          The intent of both process and content performance indicators is to provide a variety of ways for students to acquire and demonstrate mathematical reasoning ability when solving problems. The variety of approaches to verification and proof is what gives curriculum developers and teachers the flexibility to adapt strategies to address these performance indicators in a manner that meets the diverse needs of out students. Local curriculum and local/state assessments must support and allow students to use any mathematically correct method when solving a problem.

          Throughout this document the performance indicators use the words investigate, explore, discover, conjecture, reasoning, argument, justify, explain, proof, and apply. Each of these terms is an important component in developing a student's mathematical reasoning ability. It is therefore important that a clear and common definition of these terms be understood. The order of these terms reflects different stages of the reasoning process.

          Investigate/Explore - Students will be given situations in which they will be asked to look for patterns or relationships between elements within the setting.

          Discover - Students will make note of possible relationships of perpendicularity, parallelism, congruence, and/or similarity after investigation/exploration.

          Conjecture - Students will make an overall statement, thought to be true, about the new discovery.

          Reasoning - Students will engage in a process that leads to knowing something to be true or false.

          Argument - Students will communicate, in verbal or written form, the reasoning process that leads to a conclusion. A valid argument is the end result of the conjecture/reasoning process.

          Justify/Explain - Students will provide an argument for a mathematical conjecture. It may be an intuitive argument or a set of examples that support the conjecture. the argument may include, but is not limited to, a written paragraph, measurement using appropriate tools, the use of dynamic software, or a written proof.

          Proof - Students will present a valid argument, expressed in written form, justified by axioms, definitions, and theorem using properties of perpendicularity, parallelism, congr

          • Performance Indicator - MST3.G.CM.1:
            Students communicate verbally and in writing a correct, complete, coherent, and clear design (outline) and explanation for the steps used in solving a problem.
          • Performance Indicator - MST3.G.CM.2:
            Students use mathematical representations to communicate with appropriate accuracy, including numerical tables, formulas, functions, equations, charts, graphs, and diagrams.
          • Performance Indicator - MST3.G.CM.3:
            Students present organized mathematical ideas with the use of appropriate standard notations, including the use of symbols and other representations when sharing an idea in verbal and written form.
          • Performance Indicator - MST3.G.CM.4:
            Students explain relationships among different representations of a problem.
          • Performance Indicator - MST3.G.CM.5:
            Students communicate logical arguments clearly, showing why a result makes sense and why the reasoning is valid.
          • Performance Indicator - MST3.G.CM.6:
            Students support or reject arguments or questions raised by others about the correctness of mathematical work.
          • Performance Indicator - MST3.G.CM.7:
            Students read and listen for logical understanding of mathematical thinking shared by other students.
          • Performance Indicator - MST3.G.CM.8:
            Students reflect on strategies of others in relation to one's own strategy.
          • Performance Indicator - MST3.G.CM.9:
            Students formulate mathematical questions that elicit, extend, or challenge strategies, solutions, and/or conjectures of others.
          • Performance Indicator - MST3.G.CM.10:
            Students use correct mathematical language in developing mathematical questions that elicit, extend, or challenge other students' conjectures.
          • Performance Indicator - MST3.G.CM.11:
            Students understand and use appropriate language, representations, and terminology when describing objects, relationships, mathematical solutions, and geometric diagrams.
          • Performance Indicator - MST3.G.CM.12:
            Students draw conclusions about mathematical ideas through decoding, comprehension, and interpretation of mathematical visuals, symbols, and technical writing.
Loading
Data is Loading...